SeriesPart 01 / 04 of series Philosophy 2

# Philosophy 2: Rewiring the Mind§

## Eight Billion Thinkers§

With over eight billion people living out their daily lives, the volume of human activity is staggering. We have wars in certain regions, civil unrest in others, relentless activists, innovators pushing boundaries, and ordinary people just trying to survive. Some see boundless opportunity; others see a world drowning in depression and negativity. Yet, looking at the macro picture, a strange realization emerges: no one truly seems to know what is happening, or more importantly, what *should* be happening instead.

Zoom in from the global scale down to the individual, and the chaos multiplies. Everyone is generating thoughts, reacting to headlines, notifications, and internal anxieties on autopilot.

Almost two thousand five hundred (2500) years ago, figures like Tirthankar Vardhaman (also known as Mahavir swami) and Gautam Buddh meticulously mapped out the psychological machinery of human thought, desire, and suffering. And yet, 2 millennia later, we carry pocket computers that connect us to all human knowledge, while remaining entirely blind to our own internal cognitive pipelines.

To the kind of person I was a year ago, institutional religions often look dogmatic, rigid, and hopelessly disconnected from modern systemic complexities. But I have also come to realize a humbling truth: things often look outdated simply because we have never truly tried to understand them. Dismissing a framework without inspecting its source is just another form of intellectual laziness.

## Moving from Aviveka to Viveka§

More on it [here: Vivek - Spiritual ability to Discriminate](../../08/vivek-spiritual-ability-to-discriminate/index.html)

For a long time, my own strategy for navigating life was straight forward: accept the default settings, question very little, and let external circumstances dictate the direction.

Looking back, I recognize that attitude for what it was - Aviveka, a fundamental lack of discernment. Treating a human life as something to pass through without deliberate intent is like eating sand just because someone put it on a plate; it fills the space, but it is not food.

In simplified terms, it means recognizing the value of conscious effort.

Initially, trying to filter your thoughts feels like learning to drive a manual car. You are painfully aware of every mechanical action: clutching, shifting, checking speed, and second-guessing your gear. It feels exhausting. But with enough practice, the steps compile into background muscle memory. You stop staring at the dashboard, and your mind performs same actions effortlessly.

## Action Precedes Knowledge§

My own entry point into this shift did not start with a grand philosophical epiphany (means: sudden realization or moment of understanding); it started with a quiet, unpretentious (means: simple) behavioral rule. Back in 2025, I adopted a simple discipline: no eating or drinking between sunset and sunrise - an adaptation of traditional *chauvihar* (a Jain spiritual practice of completely abstaining from all food and liquids, including plain or boiled water, from local sunset until the next sunrise).

At the time, I had no complex theoretical thesis for it. Ninety-nine percent of the modern world thinks nothing of midnight snacking or late-night dining.

It was simply an instinctive discipline. More on it [here: Who Picked This Life for Me?](../../03/who-picked-this-life-for-me/index.html#the-glitch)

In Jain philosophy, there are three interconnected paths to spiritual and mental evolution: Right Conduct (*Charitra*), Right Knowledge (*Jnana*), and Right Perception (*Darshana*).

Starting with a simple anchor of Right Conduct - any physical discipline, any boundary, any behavioral rule - can act as a wedge. It forces your mind to wake up, look backward, and hunt for the knowledge and perception required to justify and sustain it. They are mutually reinforcing gears.

## Philosophy - Phase 2§

My formal foray (means: a brief attempt) into philosophy began last August. For a while, it was fascinating - a fresh vocabulary, a deep dive into logic, and a way to question. Pure philosophy is brilliant at giving you options, but it is often terrible at giving you direct, functional answers. It offers an endless buffet of "probables" when what you actually want is a clear, actionable explanation.

More on it [here: The Cost of Curiosity](../../04/why-24-if-truth-of-one-is-absolute/index.html#the-cost-of-curiosity)

However, as the recent *Paryushan* festival concluded - serving as a natural psychological New Year for me, I again find myself reflecting on the path ahead.

---